WWWBoard New Message: Message 331: B&W scan quality: FS4000 vs. Nikon Coolscan 4000 WWWBoard: Message 331 [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ ]    Posted by Jack Prebis on 02/23/03 at 5:48 PM Subject:   B&W scan quality: FS4000 vs. Nikon Coolscan 4000 Message Posted I want to scan numerous b&w negs, ranging from tri-x to pan-x Neg quality varies from excellent to barely printable in the darkroom. Of the many reviews I've read on these two scanners, there's almost nothing on how well they do, or can be made to do,on b&w negs, with whatever software. I've seen only one comment that the Nikon does a poor job with b&w. But who knows?    Follow Ups:   Re: B&W scan quality: FS4000 vs. Nikon Coolscan 4000 Allen   Posted at: 03/09/03 (2)   Re: B&W scan quality: FS4000 vs. Nikon Coolscan 4000 Spike   Posted at: 03/31/03 (0)   Re: B&W scan quality: FS4000 vs. Nikon Coolscan 4000 Spike   Posted at: 03/31/03 (0) Post a Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Message to Post : I want to scan numerous b&w negs, ranging from tri-x to pan-x Neg quality varies from excellent to barely printable in the darkroom. Of the many reviews I've read on these two scanners, there's almost nothing on how well they do, or can be made to do,on b&w negs, with whatever software. I've seen only one comment that the Nikon does a poor job with b&w. : But who knows?   [ Posting Rules | Follow Ups | Return to WWWBoard ]